<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Can Enterprise Freemium work for everyone?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.insideview.com/2009/07/13/can-enterprise-freemium-work-for-everyone/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.insideview.com/2009/07/13/can-enterprise-freemium-work-for-everyone/</link>
	<description>Smart. Fresh. Complete. Sales Intelligence powered by the Smart Cloud™</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 05:43:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Andy Wright</title>
		<link>http://blog.insideview.com/2009/07/13/can-enterprise-freemium-work-for-everyone/#comment-581</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Wright</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 04:29:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.insideview.com/?p=378#comment-581</guid>
		<description>Most large enterprises that I speak with will not use &quot;free&quot; software if they do not have a paid support contract in place.  Aside from the publicity and maturity that any application will receive through wide public consumption, would a blended support / freemium model work?  Additionally - most enterprises have very specific / special requirements - which could lead to special add-on license opportunities.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most large enterprises that I speak with will not use &#8220;free&#8221; software if they do not have a paid support contract in place.  Aside from the publicity and maturity that any application will receive through wide public consumption, would a blended support / freemium model work?  Additionally &#8211; most enterprises have very specific / special requirements &#8211; which could lead to special add-on license opportunities.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oleg Kokorin</title>
		<link>http://blog.insideview.com/2009/07/13/can-enterprise-freemium-work-for-everyone/#comment-539</link>
		<dc:creator>Oleg Kokorin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 19:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.insideview.com/?p=378#comment-539</guid>
		<description>I believe Freemium won&#039;t work for Enterprise, at least not in the nearest future. Your analysis shows why. You need millions of users paying $100 annually. I can&#039;t imagine a freemium app charging $1000 per user - it just doesn&#039;t feel right. So you need millions of paying users, meaning hundreds of million registered users. No enterprise app is ever gonna get this user base, unless it&#039;s a commodity app - like email, chat, calendar, office suite. Anyone running to start a new email company?..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe Freemium won&#8217;t work for Enterprise, at least not in the nearest future. Your analysis shows why. You need millions of users paying $100 annually. I can&#8217;t imagine a freemium app charging $1000 per user &#8211; it just doesn&#8217;t feel right. So you need millions of paying users, meaning hundreds of million registered users. No enterprise app is ever gonna get this user base, unless it&#8217;s a commodity app &#8211; like email, chat, calendar, office suite. Anyone running to start a new email company?..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
